Skip to main content

GetStream vs Sendbird vs CometChat: Chat API 2026

·APIScout Team
Share:

GetStream vs Sendbird vs CometChat: Chat API Comparison 2026

TL;DR

GetStream (now Stream) leads on developer experience and React component quality — the fastest path from zero to a production-grade chat UI. Sendbird is the enterprise incumbent with the broadest feature set, advanced moderation, and strong compliance tooling, but at higher cost. CometChat sits in the middle: reasonable feature depth, competitive pricing, and a good fit for teams building social or community features without enterprise procurement budgets. For most SaaS startups, Stream wins on DX and pricing. For regulated industries or large user bases requiring deep moderation, Sendbird is worth the premium.


Key Takeaways

  • Stream: 5B+ messages/day delivered; React, React Native, Flutter, SwiftUI, Jetpack Compose SDKs; free tier up to 25 MAU
  • Sendbird: 300M+ end users on the platform; 95% of Fortune 100 companies use it; strongest enterprise moderation and compliance tooling
  • CometChat: Fastest integration path for voice/video/chat combo; free tier for up to 25 users; white-label UI kits available
  • AI features: All three launched AI chat moderation and message summarization features in 2025–2026
  • Pricing model: All are MAU-based (monthly active users), making costs predictable but potentially expensive at social-app scale

Platform Comparison Matrix

Stream (GetStream)SendbirdCometChat
Pricing modelMAU-basedMAU-basedMAU-based
Free tier25 MAU, 1M messages30 DAU (not MAU)25 users
React SDKExcellent (component library)GoodGood
React NativeYesYesYes
Video/VoiceVia Stream Video (separate)Yes (native)Yes (native)
ModerationGoodExcellentGood
Self-hostNoNoYes (Enterprise)
AI featuresAI Assistants SDKSendbird AIAI Moderation
HIPAA complianceYes (Business+)YesYes (Enterprise)
Uptime SLA99.999%99.99%99.9%

Stream (GetStream): Best Developer Experience

Stream rebranded from "GetStream" in 2024 to reflect its expansion beyond chat into video and activity feeds. It remains the first choice for teams prioritizing React component quality and time-to-ship.

SDK quality

Stream's React component library is the most polished in the market. You get:

import { Chat, Channel, ChannelList, MessageList, MessageInput } from 'stream-chat-react';

function App() {
  const client = StreamChat.getInstance(API_KEY);
  await client.connectUser({ id: userId, name: userName }, userToken);
  
  return (
    <Chat client={client}>
      <ChannelList />
      <Channel>
        <MessageList />
        <MessageInput />
      </Channel>
    </Chat>
  );
}

The components handle virtual scrolling for large message histories, optimistic updates, file uploads, reactions, threads, mentions, and read receipts out of the box.

Stream AI Assistants

Launched in 2025, Stream AI lets you embed an AI assistant as a chat participant that responds to user messages via OpenAI, Anthropic, or a custom LLM endpoint. It handles streaming responses token-by-token and shows typing indicators while the model generates.

Stream Pricing (2026)

PlanMAUPrice/month
Free25$0
Starter250~$99
Pro5,000~$299
Business10,000+~$499+

Messages are unlimited on paid plans. MAU overage rates apply beyond plan limits.

Stream Limits

  • Moderation tooling is good but not as deep as Sendbird's (no native SafeGuard AI equivalent)
  • Video/voice is a separate product (Stream Video) billed independently
  • No self-hosted option

Sendbird: Enterprise-Grade Chat Platform

Sendbird has been in market since 2015 and has the deepest feature set of the three. If you're building for healthcare, finance, or marketplace platforms with complex moderation requirements, Sendbird's tooling is hard to match.

Sendbird's differentiators

SmartAssistant (AI chatbot): Sendbird's AI product is more mature than Stream's. You can deploy a SmartAssistant trained on your product documentation or knowledge base to handle first-touch support before handing off to human agents. It integrates with Zendesk, Salesforce, and Freshdesk.

Moderation ecosystem: Sendbird offers:

  • Image and text content moderation (via internal ML + third-party integrations)
  • User reputation scoring
  • Shadowban, soft-delete, freeze channel controls
  • Audit logs for compliance teams

Desk (Customer Service): Sendbird's CX product layer adds agent routing, SLA management, CSAT scoring, and Salesforce integration — turning a chat SDK into a full customer service platform.

Sendbird Pricing (2026)

Sendbird prices on DAU (daily active users), not MAU — an important distinction that makes their free tier seem larger than it is (30 DAU ≠ 30 MAU at typical engagement rates).

PlanDAUPrice/month
Free30$0
Starter500~$399
ProCustomCustom
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Sendbird is meaningfully more expensive than Stream at equivalent scale. For a consumer app with 5,000 MAU and average 20% daily engagement (~1,000 DAU), expect Starter pricing in the $399–$600/month range.

Sendbird Limits

  • Most expensive of the three at comparable MAU
  • DAU-based pricing is harder to predict than MAU-based
  • SDK API has more surface area (more powerful, but steeper learning curve)

CometChat: Competitive Middle Ground

CometChat targets the team that wants voice + video + chat in one package without Sendbird pricing. Its UI kits cover React, React Native, iOS, and Android with a consistent design system.

CometChat's strengths

Voice and video native: Unlike Stream (where video is a separate product), CometChat includes voice calls, video calls, and group calling as first-class features in the base SDK. This matters for social apps, telehealth, and marketplace platforms where switching between chat and video is core UX.

White-label UI Kits: CometChat's customization model is based on component-level theming, letting you match your brand without rebuilding UI components from scratch.

Mentions, reactions, typing indicators, read receipts, push notifications — all included at all paid tiers.

CometChat Pricing (2026)

PlanUsersPrice/month
Free25$0
Startup500~$149
Growth10,000~$399
EnterpriseCustomCustom

CometChat's self-hosted enterprise tier is unique — if you need on-premise deployment for compliance, it's the only one of the three with that option.

CometChat Limits

  • React component library is less polished than Stream's
  • Enterprise self-host has a significant setup cost
  • Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Sendbird

Feature Deep Dive: Moderation

FeatureStreamSendbirdCometChat
Text moderationVia Moderation APIBuilt-in + AIVia third-party
Image moderationYesYes (SafeGuard)Yes
User muting/banningYesYesYes
ShadowbanNoYesYes
Audit logsLimitedFullLimited
CSAM detectionNoYesNo
Auto-moderation rulesBasicAdvancedBasic

Sendbird's SafeGuard AI moderation (launched 2024) is the most mature option — it combines content classification, user reputation, and rule-based triggers into a single moderation layer.


Use Case Decision Guide

Use caseBest choice
React SaaS product, fast shipStream
Enterprise customer support platformSendbird
Social app with voice/video + chatCometChat
Healthcare/HIPAA complianceStream or Sendbird
Marketplace seller-buyer messagingStream or Sendbird
On-premise self-hosting requiredCometChat Enterprise
Gaming in-game chatStream
Community/social networkCometChat or Stream
AI chatbot embedded in support flowSendbird SmartAssistant

Pricing at 10,000 MAU (Estimated)

Platform~Monthly CostNotes
Stream~$300–500Depends on feature tier
Sendbird~$600–1,200DAU model; varies by engagement rate
CometChat~$399Growth plan includes 10K users

CometChat offers the most predictable cost at this scale. Sendbird is most expensive. Stream sits in the middle with the best component library.


Which Chat API Should You Use?

Choose Stream if you're building a SaaS product and your team works primarily in React. The SDK quality and documentation are the best in category, and the $99–$299 startup tier gives room to grow.

Choose Sendbird if you're in a regulated industry, need deep moderation with audit trails, or are building a customer support workflow on top of chat. The premium pricing reflects genuine depth in compliance, moderation, and CX integrations.

Choose CometChat if you need voice + video + chat in one package at a price below Sendbird, or if on-premise self-hosting is a hard requirement.


Further Reading

The API Integration Checklist (Free PDF)

Step-by-step checklist: auth setup, rate limit handling, error codes, SDK evaluation, and pricing comparison for 50+ APIs. Used by 200+ developers.

Join 200+ developers. Unsubscribe in one click.